WHY was there Molten Metal Under Ground Zero for
Months after 9/11?
Molten metal flowed underneath ground zero for
months after the Twin Towers collapsed:
Only
Thermite/Themate would cause Ground Zero to burn
for three months after 9/11/01.
Thermite
is used to demolish buildings. Even heavy rains
and snow were unable to extinguish the molten
steel at Ground Zero.
What
kind of person would deny there was molten steel
at Ground Zero?
Despite
all the N.Y. Firemen's testimony, all the
photographs and videotapes of molten steel at
Ground Zero, certain individuals INSIST there
was NO molten steel at Ground Zero. Lordy, Lordy. This
is the kind of ignorance and subterfuge we're up
against.
.r o
n
corvuswire@verizon.net
Indeed, the trade center fire was
"the longest-burning structural fire in
history",
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn1634
Even though it rained
heavily on September 14, 2001
http://www.courttv.com/assault_on_america/0914_rain_ap.html
Even though it rained heavily
again on September 21, 2001,
http://www.wnbc.com/news/962722/detail.html
the fires and molten steel were
sprayed with high tech fire-retardants,
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn1634
"firetrucks sprayed a
nearly constant jet of water on "Ground Zero."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/12/19/...ain321907.shtml
Indeed, "You couldn't even
begin to imagine how much water was pumped in
there," said Tom Manley of the Uniformed
Firefighters Association, the largest fire
department union. "It was like you were creating
a giant lake."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/12/19/...ain321907.shtml
An employee of
New Jersey's Task Force One Urban Search and
Rescue witnessed "Fires burning and molten
steel flowing in the pile of ruins still
settling beneath her feet."
http://www.sas.upenn.edu/sasalum/newsltr/s...r2002/k911.html
The head of a team of scientists studying the
potential health effects of 9/11, reported,
"Fires are still actively burning and the smoke
is very intense. In some pockets now being
uncovered, they are finding molten steel."
http://www.jhsph.edu/Publications/Special/Welch.htm
A public health advisor who arrived at Ground
Zero on September 12, said that "feeling
the heat" and "seeing the molten steel" there
reminded him of a volcano.
http://www.neha.org/9-11%20report/index-The.html
New York firefighters
recalled in a documentary film, "heat so
intense they encountered rivers of molten
steel."
http://www.nypost.com/movies/19574.htm
According to a worker involved with the
organizing of demolition, excavation and debris
removal operations at ground zero,
"Underground it was still so hot that molten
metal dripped down the sides of the wall from
Building 6."
http://www.globalsecurity.org/security/lib...-11_commission/
An expert stated about World Trade Center
building 7, "A combination of an
uncontrolled fire and the structural damage
might have been able to bring the building down,
some engineers said. But that would not explain
steel members in the debris pile that appear to
have been PARTLY EVAPORATED in extraordinarily
high temperatures" (pay-per-view).
http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.htm...DA80994D9404482
Note that evaporation means conversion
from a liquid to a gas; so the steel
beams in building 7 were subjected to
temperatures high enough to melt and evaporate
them.
http://www.answers.com/evaporation&r=67
A reporter with rare access to the debris at
ground zero "descended deep below street
level to areas where underground fires still
burned and steel flowed in molten streams."
http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2002/07/77nwash.htm
The same journalist also
refers to "the streams of molten metal
that leaked from the hot cores and flowed down
broken walls inside the foundation hole."
(pages 31-32)
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0002E5QK...glance&n=283155
An engineer stated in the September 3, 2002
issue of The Structural Engineer, "They
showed us many fascinating slides ranging from
molten metal, which was still red hot weeks
after the event."
http://web.archive.org/web/20030422113455/...002-NewYork.pdf
An Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Officer at the Trade Center reported a
fire truck 10 feet below the ground that was
still burning two weeks after the Tower
collapsed, "its metal so hot that it looked like
a vat of molten steel."
http://www.thenewliberator.com/wethepeople.htm
The structural engineer responsible for the
design of the WTC, described fires still
burning and molten steel still running 21 days
after the attacks.
http://www.seau.org/SEAUNews-2001-10.pdf
According to a member of New York Air National
Guard's 109th Air Wing, who was at Ground Zero
from September 22 to October 6, "One
fireman told us that there was still molten
steel at the heart of the towers' remains.
Firemen sprayed water to cool the debris down
but the heat remained intense enough at the
surface to melt their boots."
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_...112/ai_n9015802
A fireman stated that there were "oven"
like conditions at the trade centers six weeks
after 9/11.
http://plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%2...low_quality.wmv
Firemen and hazardous materials experts also
stated that, six weeks after 9/11, "There
are pieces of steel being pulled out [from as
far as six stories underground] that are still
cherry red" and "the blaze is so 'far beyond a
normal fire' that it is nearly impossible to
draw conclusions about it based on other fires."
(pay-per-view)
http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/nydailynews/87...LDER+FOR+MONTHS
A NY Department of Sanitation spokeswoman said
"for about two and a half months after the
attacks, in addition to its regular duties, NYDS
played a major role in debris removal -
everything from molten steel beams to human
remains...."
http://wasteage.com/mag/waste_dday_ny_sanitation/
As late as five months after the attacks, in
February 2002, firefighter Joe O'Toole saw
a steel beam being lifted from deep underground
at Ground Zero, which, he says, "was dripping
from the molten steel."
http://www.fallenbrothers.com/community/sh...p=2948#post2948
